The Judicial Resolution of Church Property Disputes: Canadian and American Models

Authors

  • Alvin J. Esau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/alr1341

Abstract

This article examines the jurisprudence on church property entitlements in the context of membership disputes at Hutterite colonies. The author explores the approaches that Canadian and American courts have taken in dealing with competing claims to church assets held in trust for the use of the members. When faced with allocation issues, Canadian courts have focused on the terms of the trust to determine which faction of the religious association most closely falls within the scope of the trust. By way of contrast, American courts have been more conscious about the separation of church and stale and have employed the following models for adjudicating church property disputes: (I) polity-deference, (2) neutral-principles, and (3) the abstention model. The author concludes that the gap between the Canadian and American approaches is not as wide as it may initially appear.

Downloads

Published

2003-04-01

Issue

Vol 40, No 4

Section

Articles

License

For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License

For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:

  1. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
  2. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
  3. Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
  4. Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.

To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.