Drug Dependence: An Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2160Abstract
Dr. Dewhurst favours the establishment of scientific biological criteria to assess the effect of drugs on man and on society and to aid in the re form of contemporary drug legislation. He contends that current tripartite legislation develops three approaches to problem which the medical profession views as singular. Thus the legislation leads to legal and social paradox. The author proceeds to view the extent of the modern drug pro blem through available data and suggests that the recent upsurge in drug use is largely attributable to the effective marketing procedures of illicit drug manufacturers. These marketing techniques cater to the human long ing for euphoria, and the desire to repeat the euphoria, artificially produced by drugs, may lead to increased use and produce delirium which seriously reduces the users social productivity and life-expectancy. The author con cludes that bans placed on drugs have been largely ineffective in control ling distribution and use. The result is situation, produced by general human needs and illicit marketing procedures, over which society has no control The solution proposed is to regain control by allowing certain drugs to be cheaply distributed under the control of the medical profession and to legalize other drugs through the passage of legislation similar to provincial liquor legislation.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.