Trespass or Negligence?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/alr2161Abstract
The author examines the validity of distinguishing between trespass to the person and negligence, according to whether the injury was directly inflicted by or merely consequential to negligently performed act. Whereas recent English decisions have tended to merge the two forms of action, in other Commonwealth jurisdictions, including Canada, the historical distinction has largely been retained, despite certain amount of equivocation in the case law. One significant problem arising from any "progressive" union would be the extent to which the concepts of foreseeability, causation and other sinuosities of negligence law would be incorporated into the action. Another consideration would be whether the plaintiff would be required to satisfy uniform burden of proof regardless of whether the injury were direct or indirect. Recognizing that "forms of action must not rule us from their graves", Dean Fridman points out that there may be good reason for not burying distinctions before their usefulness and purpose have died.Downloads
Published
1971-02-01
Issue
Section
Articles
License
For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.
