Holmes on Law and Morality

Authors

  • Mark Strasser Trustees Professor of Law, Capital University Law School, Columbus, Ohio.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29173/alr357

Abstract

This article explores Justice Holmes' position on the relationship between law and morality, and discusses

some of the mistaken interpretations of that position.  Commentators' claims to the contrary notwithstanding, Holmes 'predictive theory of law and his discussion of the "bad man" do not illustrate the separation between law and morality but merely that lawful actions need not be performed for morally praiseworthy reasons and that positive law and morality do not always coincide. He suggested that the conflation of law and morality might be reduced by changing legal terminology so that moral and legal terms would not overlap, a proposal with possible drawbacks that Holmes did not seem to appreciate.  That said, however, detractors overestimate the extent to which Holmes asserted that law and morality should be distinguished, thereby distorting both Holmes' views and the value of his insights.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-30

Issue

Vol 44, No 2

Section

Articles

License

For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License

For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.

Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:

  1. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
  2. Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
  3. Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
  4. Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.

To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.