Jurisdictional Problems in Canada's Offshore
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29173/alr626Keywords:
Energy Law, Petroleum LawAbstract
As oil and gas exploration activities are beginning to concentrate in offshore regions, it is inevitable that two major problems will be encountered: (1) international boundaries; and (2) federal-provincial control over offshore resources. The authors devote the first part of their paper to discussion of the first problem. They analyze the historical origin of offshore rights; current international law on the subject; various methods of determining boundaries; followed by detailed examination of six of Canada's present boundary disputes and the corresponding position taken by the concerned countries in each case. The latter part of the paper is devoted to the federal-provincial issue, concentrating on constitutional aspects, resource sharing, and admin istration of the offshore operation. The authors critically analyze the Offshore Minerals Reference case, and proceed to comparative study between Canada, Australia, and the United States with respect to the control, development and exploitation of offshore resources. The federal offer to the provinces, consisting of arbitrary boundaries for purposes of administration, is critically evaluated and rejected. In its place, the authors propose some viable alter natives. Finally, the applicability of ancillary federal and provincial laws to the offshore region is examined.Downloads
Issue
Section
License
For Editions following and including Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
For Editions prior to Volume 61 No. 1, the following applies.
Author(s) retain original copyright in the substantive content of the titled work, subject to the following rights that are granted indefinitely:
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to produce, publish, disseminate, and distribute the titled work in electronic format to online database services, including, but not limited to: LexisNexis, QuickLaw, HeinOnline, and EBSCO;
- Author(s) grant the Alberta Law Review permission to post the titled work on the Alberta Law Review website and/or related websites.
- Author(s) agree that the titled work may be used for educational or instructional purposes and/or in educational or instructional materials. The author(s) acknowledge that the titled work is subject to other such "fair dealing" provisions and applicable legislation.
- Author(s) grant a limited license to those accessing the titled work from an electronic database or an Alberta Law Review website to download the titled work onto their computer and to print a copy for their own personal, non-commercial use, subject to proper attribution.
To use the journal's content elsewhere, permission must be obtained from the author(s) and the Alberta Law Review.